-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v0.20.0 ignores inline ignores in the modules #355
Comments
v0.20.0 only uses the latest release of Trivy (v0.51.1). If you see issues running the action as you mentioned, could you try running Trivy (v0.51.1) by locally to see what results you get? If there are discrepancies, could you please file a discussion in the Trivy repo: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/new/choose so we can take a look? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What
We are using private TF modules and in some cases, these modules are fairly opinionated to simplify the configuration for engineers, eg:
When using
v0.19.0
the check passes as expected, however the same config and code fails usingv0.20.0
.v0.19.0
more aligns with howtfsec
worked for us before. If a configuration decision is made in the module (like above example the encryption method) I should be handle ignore at the module level.GH Action job
Action output
v0.19.0:
v0.20.0:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: