makeClaim on transaction default + add defaulted state

[aquaflamingo]

Thinking

When the transaction owner (i.e. person who's paying for the goods) defaults on the counter party (i.e. goods were sent, but trxn owner decides not to settle payment), counter party makes a claim providing a proof of default (i.e. proof of location goods delivery).

State should change to defaulted, and the insurance coverage should be dispersed to counterparty?

Immediate concerns

• need proof of location or alternative proof - (location, FOAM)?
• IPFS integration
• claims view.