Update to latest official deck registration sheet

[tooomm]

Just tiny updates...
https://wpn.wizards.com/sites/wpn/files/attachements/mtg_constructed_deck_registration_sheet_pdf11.pdf

[Nightfirecat]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the three visible changes I can see (outside of spacing/fonts) are as follows:

1. No "Table Number" and associated box at the top of the page
2. Next to "Main Deck" header is an annotation saying "(Magic: 60 Minimum)"
3. Next to "Sideboard" header is an annotation saying "(Magic: up to 15)"

[tooomm]

• The First Letter of Last Name box in the upper right has a colored background
  (same for First Name, Last Name and DCI#)
• Hint that basic lands needs to be registerd as well! Main Deck Continued & Basic Lands:

Yes, and font type/size + spacing changes. # in deck is always underlined as well for example.

I couldn't overlay both files yet to see if all fields have the same position.
But regarding the changes I guess it should be more or less identical.

[Nightfirecat]

Now that I've finally submitted #42, I plan on addressing this once I can get it merged.

[Nightfirecat]

cc: @april

I'm inclined to say that for ease of printing, we shouldn't add the colored backgrounds. Given that our generated version already differs significantly (through small sizing/spacing differences) from the official copy, I feel we have some lenience in how we implement it.

That said, I agree the additional text and changed text should definitely match the new official sheet.

I'll likely work on this during the week and put in a PR over the weekend for this.

[april]

I don't see any colored backgrounds, but I agree we should probably just stay grayscale. Overall I'm not too worried about it, given that our printouts already look way nicer than anything the official DCI list produces.

[Nightfirecat]

I'm referring to the grey backgrounds of the last name, first name, DCI# and first-letter-of-last-name fields along the left side and the top of the official sheet. Ultimately, it's not hard for me to add them, I'm just on the fence about it given that we don't have any grey backgrounds in the current iteration of the jsPDF DCI sheet.

[april]

Ehhhhhh, I would say we can leave them without the shading. They shading is mostly there because players overlook those fields a lot, which isn't really a problem on decklist.org.

[april]

(also they look ugly, but you know that's just my opinion and all)