You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While working on #917 I realized that rolled back locks may unnecessarily cause collisions. If a transaction could only lock a subset of columns, then it will fail and rollback the locks it did acquire. These rolled back locks should not cause other transactions to fail. It seems that the code may treat these rolled back locks as successful locks which can cause other transaction to fail unnecessarily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While working on #917 I realized that rolled back locks may unnecessarily cause collisions. If a transaction could only lock a subset of columns, then it will fail and rollback the locks it did acquire. These rolled back locks should not cause other transactions to fail. It seems that the code may treat these rolled back locks as successful locks which can cause other transaction to fail unnecessarily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: