pipx does not pass --global on upgrade

[martin-dziura-ot]

Summary

pipx role does not install packages globally when requesting state: latest, but it does with state: present

Issue Type

Bug Report

Component Name

pipx

Ansible Version

ansible [core 2.17.6]
  config file = /workspace/ansible.cfg
  configured module search path = ['/home/vscode/.ansible/plugins/modules', '/usr/share/ansible/plugins/modules']
  ansible python module location = /home/vscode/.local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/ansible
  ansible collection location = /home/vscode/.ansible/collections:/usr/share/ansible/collections
  executable location = /home/vscode/.local/bin/ansible
  python version = 3.12.3 (main, Apr 24 2024, 11:17:35) [GCC 12.2.0] (/usr/local/bin/python)
  jinja version = 3.1.4
  libyaml = True

Community.general Version

# /home/vscode/.ansible/collections/ansible_collections
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 10.0.0 

# /home/vscode/.local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/ansible_collections
Collection        Version
----------------- -------
community.general 9.5.1 

Configuration

$ ansible-config dump --only-changed

OS / Environment

devontainer mcr.microsoft.com/vscode/devcontainers/python

Steps to Reproduce

- community.general.pipx:
    name: hello-world
    global: true
    state: latest

Expected Results

"cmd": ["/bin/python3", "-m", "pipx", "upgrade", "--global", "hello-world"]

Actual Results

"cmd": ["/bin/python3", "-m", "pipx", "upgrade", "hello-world"]

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow the Ansible Code of Conduct

[ansibullbot]

Files identified in the description:

• plugins/modules/pipx.py

If these files are incorrect, please update the component name section of the description or use the !component bot command.

click here for bot help

[ansibullbot]

cc @russoz
click here for bot help

[russoz]

Hi @martin-dziura-ot thanks for your report.

From your description, I reckon you are probably using the community.general 9.5.1 instead of the 10.0.0. I created a PR (9170, mentioned above) that proves that the command line is being generated as it should, at least in the latest code.

Could you please ensure you are using the 10.0.0 version in your test? I believe it will produce the expected outcome.