Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AHS submission dry run or task validation. #550

Open
weinbe58 opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

AHS submission dry run or task validation. #550

weinbe58 opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@weinbe58
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the feature you'd like
I want the ability to perform a dry run for AHS task submission. The idea would be to validate the task without actually submitting the task to the queue.

How would this feature be used? Please describe.
This would be useful to prototype tasks and help when submitting batches of tasks: validating all tasks before submitting them to the queue.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Not really any clear option to do this.

@christianbmadsen
Copy link
Contributor

@weinbe58 Thank you for opening this request. The ask makes sense. Could you add a bit of context to your specific use case? Is it related to speed of debugging? Ability to build in exception handling during larger workloads? Something else? Thanks!

@christianbmadsen christianbmadsen added the enhancement New feature or request label May 23, 2023
@weinbe58
Copy link
Contributor Author

weinbe58 commented May 25, 2023

Is it related to speed of debugging?

Yes, one of the most common issues is trying to fit the minimum time step.

Ability to build in exception handling during larger workloads?

yes, many jobs require running batches of tasks that are related. Those tasks are generated programmatically and some errors can happen when generating some of those tasks. This is particularly difficult to track down where the issue is so repeated submission and cancellation is not ideal.

@weinbe58
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christianbmadsen Any update on this issue?

@christianbmadsen
Copy link
Contributor

@weinbe58 your ask makes sense. We dont have a timeline for implementing dry-run internally. Would you be interested in picking up such a contribution if we open up an issue with implementation guidelines for you and help you with the PR reviews?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants