You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should allow Transform to be used as a property binding value, just like we allow Mat4.
This likely means using the new type-class which is not Syntactic (see #3) and making Transform compatible with M 4 4 in the Compatible families.
I wonder if it would also be possible for user-defined types to extend the compatible type family -- even though Transform should be built in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should allow
Transform
to be used as a property binding value, just like we allowMat4
.This likely means using the new type-class which is not Syntactic (see #3) and making
Transform
compatible withM 4 4
in the Compatible families.I wonder if it would also be possible for user-defined types to extend the compatible type family -- even though Transform should be built in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: