Renaming x-modelable to x-proxy #4335
Closed
jillesme
started this conversation in
3. Feature Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I think it's meant to indicate how it is linked with the model. I don't think It technically entangles the two values, not really proxying them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I'd like to suggest a major breaking change. When reading the documentation, I was a little confused by
x-modelable
. The docs say:To me, this sounds exactly like what a proxy would do. It could either be a breaking change, or an addition. This would make more sense to me personally:
What do y'all think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions