Fix type mismatch in smart contract function signatures #72
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1) What was the problem?
The problem was related to type mismatches in the
record_ai_info
method signatures of theVerifyMedicalAI
smart contract. The method signatures were initially defined using basic Python types such asstr
,bool
, andUInt64
. This led to compile-time errors because the ARC4 framework requires using ARC4-specific types (likearc4.String
,arc4.Bool
, andarc4.UInt64
) for both defining data structures and for function parameters to maintain type safety and adhere to ARC4's strict type system. The errors were preventing the smart contract from being built, as ARC4 could not correctly interpret these basic Python types in the context of ARC4's static type checking.2) How did you solve the problem?
I solved the problem by updating the
record_ai_info
method's parameter types from Python's built-in types to ARC4-specific types. This involved changing the function signatures to expectarc4.String
,arc4.UInt64
, andarc4.Bool
directly, rather than the standard Pythonstr
,bool
, andUInt64
. By aligning the method signatures with the types used in theAiInfo
struct, I ensured type consistency and compatibility across the contract. This change addressed the build errors by satisfying ARC4's type requirements, allowing the contract to compile successfully and ensuring that all operations within the contract adhere to the expected type safety standards of ARC4.3) Screenshot of your terminal showing the result of running the deploy script.