We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello Alexander, Testing face reco with CUDA works very well, BUT produce strange values on w and h values (box size):
testing different sizes (320x240) (160x120) and same results :
(x, y, w, h) feedback : good (x, y) values, realistic ones ! (w, h) values : (240, 240) or (96, 96) only !!
These are not realistic values and they should vary ! Here, the box is either 240x240, or 96x96
I don'f find where I could change values in your program, to reduce limit !
An idea ?
Thanks Alexander
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello all, Answer : This is due to haarcascade file build, and some distance variations appear, depending of the choosen xml file.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hello Alexander,
Testing face reco with CUDA works very well, BUT produce strange values on w and h values (box size):
testing different sizes (320x240) (160x120) and same results :
(x, y, w, h) feedback :
good (x, y) values, realistic ones !
(w, h) values : (240, 240) or (96, 96) only !!
These are not realistic values and they should vary !
Here, the box is either 240x240, or 96x96
I don'f find where I could change values in your program, to reduce limit !
An idea ?
Thanks Alexander
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: