Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Track serverless-jetpack serverless 3.x support #122

Open
NoxHarmonium opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Track serverless-jetpack serverless 3.x support #122

NoxHarmonium opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
dependency An issue that requires a third party to fix their code rather than us

Comments

@NoxHarmonium
Copy link
Contributor

NoxHarmonium commented Sep 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Seems like serverless-jetpack doesn't support the serverless 3 config properly yet. In particular we need support for "patterns" rather than "include/exclude".

The side effect is that ADL boilerplate lambdas bundle zips are including the .adl staging directory for some reason and are 1 MB each rather than only a few KB.

The side effect of this is that we have to have an exception to inject severless 2.x style config if serverless-jetpack is in use.

FormidableLabs/serverless-jetpack#208

We should keep an eye on when serverless 3 support lands so that serverless-jetpack users can benefit from the reduced bundle size that the other bundlers get.
@NoxHarmonium NoxHarmonium added the dependency An issue that requires a third party to fix their code rather than us label Sep 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dependency An issue that requires a third party to fix their code rather than us
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@NoxHarmonium