You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe we need to assume the axiom of function extensionality to prove that -> is a functor on Sets, and likely we'll need it to prove other common-in-Haskell functors are indeed functors, for example State.
Do we want these instances requiring extensionality in this library, and if so, where should we put them? I propose Categories.Examples.Functor.Sets.WithExtensionality for example and have the *.WithExtensionality modules parametrized on Extensionality
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I believe we need to assume the axiom of function extensionality to prove that -> is a functor on Sets, and likely we'll need it to prove other common-in-Haskell functors are indeed functors, for example State.
Do we want these instances requiring extensionality in this library, and if so, where should we put them? I propose
Categories.Examples.Functor.Sets.WithExtensionality
for example and have the*.WithExtensionality
modules parametrized on ExtensionalityThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: