Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extensionality? #6

Open
Taneb opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Extensionality? #6

Taneb opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@Taneb
Copy link
Member

Taneb commented Oct 21, 2020

I believe we need to assume the axiom of function extensionality to prove that -> is a functor on Sets, and likely we'll need it to prove other common-in-Haskell functors are indeed functors, for example State.

Do we want these instances requiring extensionality in this library, and if so, where should we put them? I propose Categories.Examples.Functor.Sets.WithExtensionality for example and have the *.WithExtensionality modules parametrized on Extensionality

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant