Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fielded format modifications #210

Open
golnazads opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Fielded format modifications #210

golnazads opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor

golnazads commented Dec 6, 2021

A user has requested six addition/modification for Endpoint format

1- Add editor to Endnote, in addition to authors. For example for bibcode 2007LNP...720..403W
add
%E Papantonopoulos, Lefteris

ADS, ProCite, Refman, and Medlars do not include editor.

RefWorks in classic includes editor with author tag
A1 Papantonopoulos, Lefteris
however, from https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/RefWorks/Legacy_RefWorks/05Managing_References/020RefWorks_Tagged_Format
apparently tag for editor is A2. Hence add editor with tag A2 to RefWorks format.

2- Page range should be displayed for endnote if available instead of just start page. For example for bibcode 2000A&AS..146..141P
page should be
%P 141-155

ADS, ProCite, Refman, and RefWorks correctly format start and end page with their respective tags.

Medlars also need page range displayed as
PG - 141-155

3- Display title book with its own tag for endnote. For example for bibcode 2007LNP...720..403W we have
"pub":"The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy",
"title":["Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity"],

which export formats for Endnote
%J The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy
while classic has
%T Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity
%B The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy

From: https://sourceforge.net/p/bibus-biblio/bugs/_discuss/thread/9f7f2644/3273/attachment/EndNote_Format_EndNoteX1WinManual.pdf
there are
%B Secondary Title
(of a Book or Conference Name)
%J Secondary Title (Journal Name)
my understanding is that it should be decide which tag to include, %B or %J, based on doctype. On the side of BibTex book title is included for doctypes of inbook, proceedings, and in proceedings. So I am guessing it could be the same here. @aaccomazzi

As far as I can tell the other four fielded formats are OK, and do not require different tags for publication based on doctype.

4- Display the field publication. Need to find out the status of this field in solr.

The same user also requested two other modifications,
For Theses:
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PhDT.......120R/abstract

  • the university is listed as %+ (author address) but it would be more helpful under %I (University) [or perhaps under both?]
  • I don’t know if there is a way to parse out “advisor” from the %Z list, but if so, that could be listed under %Y

Export does not do any parsing of the fields, it displays everything as is. @aaccomazzi thoughts?

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor Author

golnazads commented Jan 19, 2022

@aaccomazzi
regarding #3 to display tag %B for inbook, proceedings, and inproceedings, similar to BibTex that displays booktitle for these types, and %J for the rest of the doctypes
however noticed that proceedings is mapped to Journal Article for endnotes, so was not sure if still need to display tag %B for proceedings.

Here are how the doctype are mapped to endnote types

The following doctype are mapped to 'Journal Article'
article, proceedings, misc, bookreview, erratum, obituary, editorial, pressrelease, circular, newsletter, catalog

doctype book is mapped to Book
doctype inbook is mapped to Book Section
doctype inproceedings is mapped to Conference Proceedings
doctype eprint is mapped to Electronic Article

doctypes abstract and talk are mapped to Conference Paper
doctypes phdthesis' and mastersthesis are mapped to Thesis
doctypes techreport and intechreport are mapped to Report
doctypes software and proposal are mapped to Miscellaneous

checked a few proceedings record in classic and they have been mapped to Conference Proceedings
https://classic.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SPIE11450E....A
https://classic.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020mbhe.confE.....
https://classic.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020jsrs.conf.....B
I think I should change the mapping for proceedings? right? @aaccomazzi

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor Author

The first three issues were implemented in v3.0.12.

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor Author

More request from [email protected] for endpoint fielded format.

I noticed a few more items that could possibly be improved for export to endnote. For conference abstracts like this one, could the conference location be parsed out of the information and added to the endnote export?
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003lmim.conf.4126C/abstract

image

Also for books, could the place of publication be exported? Right now it is not (the place of publication is Cambridge, UK in the example below).

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002mef..book.....S/abstract

image

@golnazads
Copy link
Contributor Author

From Edwin
Edwin Henneken
@golnaz You can tell her that we will record this as a feature request. At this point we cannot give any estimates for when this will be implemented.

@aaccomazzi
Copy link
Member

Casting this in a larger context, I think it's worth considering if there are changes we want to make both to SOLR and upstream to properly field this data (location info):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants