Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] Support for React Server Components / Next.js App Router #268

Open
dstr89 opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[feature] Support for React Server Components / Next.js App Router #268

dstr89 opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dstr89
Copy link

dstr89 commented Sep 10, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have a client interested to switch from React client side rendering to Next.js static site generation. However, given that this library is written client-side, we cannot use React Server Components / Next.js App Router.

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be great if we had support for editing React Server Components with AEM Standard Editor or Universal Editor. Competitor CMS systems already have support for visual editing/live preview of React Server Components.
See for example https://www.storyblok.com/tp/add-a-headless-cms-to-next-js-13-in-5-minutes or https://www.contentful.com/blog/integrate-contentful-next-js-app-router/

Describe alternatives you've considered
This library works fine if you stick to the old Next.js Pages Router. However, in that case its is not possible to leverage the best and latest features of React and Next.js. For example the new caching mechanism and full SSG that makes pages perform great on mobile, with Lighthouse scores comparable with Adobe EDS.

Additional context
I really hope this gets prioritized by Adobe, as not every client is open for switching to EDS and plain JS development duo to resource limitations and the fact that frontend devs are much more open to work with React/Next.js stack. I see this approach as a great alternative to EDS providing more flexibility.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant