Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JAT check #23

Open
5 of 8 tasks
dabreegster opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
5 of 8 tasks

JAT check #23

dabreegster opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
nice-to-have Not blocking a first release route check tool

Comments

@dabreegster
Copy link
Collaborator

dabreegster commented Apr 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • Be able to manage multiple intersections and proposed/existing
  • Improve style and flow to get to a map
  • Add the scores
  • Start by labeling the arms
  • Improve arrows: delayed redrawing, z-ordering, offset with the rotation
  • Overhaul the form
  • Consider tooltips
  • Consider auto-labeling movements based on the nearest arms, and/or checking the number of movements is expected

Having a semantic / GIS version of this data would start to let us compile a database of examples, then show a user examples of 5-armed junctions, for instance
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
@dabreegster
Start experimenting with drawing arrows for JAT check. #23
63ae973
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2024
@dabreegster
Start recording JAT info. #23
a9cbb8e
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2024
@dabreegster
Use SVG arrows as the markers. #23
690f6e0
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
@dabreegster
Handle JAT arrows much more simply, with a non-interactive symbol layer
4bf3e2f 
and rotated text. #23

Still problems with:
- the delay during movement
- getting an offset to work with rotation
- z-ordering (invisible markers as the workaround)
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
@dabreegster
More JAT tweaks: #23
0256265 
- click a marker to select
- arrows on both ends of a pedestrian movement
- color -> score
- comments
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2024
@dabreegster
Restructure JAT data and page flow to capture multiple junctions and …
04eaea6 
…handle existing/proposed. #23
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2024
@dabreegster
Show JAT score. #23
494ad18
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2024
@dabreegster
Map and manage arms per junction. #23
1d215cf 
Very clunky start, but minimally working.
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2024
@dabreegster
Flatten the page flow in JAT by one level. #23
41e60a3
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2024
@dabreegster
Fix JAT scores when there are no movements. #23
4ba8819
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2024
@dabreegster
Add a control point to JAT, and simplify the movement types. #23
2a485ee
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2024
@dabreegster
Tool to copy JAT movements from the other stage. #23
f53d0d7
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@dabreegster
Address feedback: Make it more clear what JAT is being edited. #23
7b96da4
dabreegster added a commit that referenced this issue May 21, 2024
@dabreegster
Define JAT list of junctions on a map. #23
e889e41 
UX is clunky, not sure about this
@dabreegster dabreegster added the nice-to-have Not blocking a first release label May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
nice-to-have Not blocking a first release route check tool
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dabreegster