We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello,
I have got this result that puzzles me a bit, in particular that despite I have 99.51% of the reads mapped I have Coverage >= 1x equal to 0%:
# contigs (>= 0 bp) 230 # contigs (>= 1000 bp) 105 # contigs (>= 5000 bp) 72 # contigs (>= 10000 bp) 63 # contigs (>= 25000 bp) 47 # contigs (>= 50000 bp) 35 Total length (>= 0 bp) 4920005 Total length (>= 1000 bp) 4887678 Total length (>= 5000 bp) 4808785 Total length (>= 10000 bp) 4749011 Total length (>= 25000 bp) 4484487 Total length (>= 50000 bp) 4084322 # contigs 118 Largest contig 301160 Total length 4898153 GC (%) 55.51 N50 105561 N75 66243 L50 14 L75 28 # total reads 1069294 # left 271135 # right 270389 Mapped (%) 99.51 Properly paired (%) 48.66 Avg. coverage depth 0 Coverage >= 1x (%) 0.0 # N's per 100 kbp 20.42 # predicted genes (unique) 4154 # predicted genes (>= 0 bp) 4151 + 3 part # predicted genes (>= 300 bp) 3858 + 3 part # predicted genes (>= 1500 bp) 679 + 1 part # predicted genes (>= 3000 bp) 72 + 0 part
what can be a possible explanation?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hello,
I have got this result that puzzles me a bit, in particular that despite I have 99.51% of the reads mapped I have Coverage >= 1x equal to 0%:
what can be a possible explanation?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: