Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage 0 with nearly all reads mapped #227

Open
domenico-simone opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Coverage 0 with nearly all reads mapped #227

domenico-simone opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@domenico-simone
Copy link

Hello,

I have got this result that puzzles me a bit, in particular that despite I have 99.51% of the reads mapped I have Coverage >= 1x equal to 0%:

# contigs (>= 0 bp)     230
# contigs (>= 1000 bp)  105
# contigs (>= 5000 bp)  72
# contigs (>= 10000 bp) 63
# contigs (>= 25000 bp) 47
# contigs (>= 50000 bp) 35
Total length (>= 0 bp)  4920005
Total length (>= 1000 bp)       4887678
Total length (>= 5000 bp)       4808785
Total length (>= 10000 bp)      4749011
Total length (>= 25000 bp)      4484487
Total length (>= 50000 bp)      4084322
# contigs       118
Largest contig  301160
Total length    4898153
GC (%)  55.51
N50     105561
N75     66243
L50     14
L75     28
# total reads   1069294
# left  271135
# right 270389
Mapped (%)      99.51
Properly paired (%)     48.66
Avg. coverage depth     0
Coverage >= 1x (%)      0.0
# N's per 100 kbp       20.42
# predicted genes (unique)      4154
# predicted genes (>= 0 bp)     4151 + 3 part
# predicted genes (>= 300 bp)   3858 + 3 part
# predicted genes (>= 1500 bp)  679 + 1 part
# predicted genes (>= 3000 bp)  72 + 0 part

what can be a possible explanation?

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant