!!! The title and description of the submitted proposal is incorrect due to an error on the IPFS reference used. This proposal updates risk parameters on Optimism, not supply/borrow caps on Arbitrum !!!
https://app.aave.com/governance/proposal/?proposalId=205
🔧 📊 params-update
This proposal updates the risk parameters of WBTC and DAI on Aave v3 Optimism.
Transaction: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1bd2e5e01c505ab8f412391ed764b2d0313b974d8e73e02fcab3f01132e46da0
- id: 205
- creator: 0xbc540e0729b732fb14afa240aa5a047ae9ba7df0
- executor: 0xee56e2b3d491590b5b31738cc34d5232f378a8d5
- targets: [0x5f5c02875a8e9b5a26fbd09040abcfdeb2aa6711]
- values: [0]
- signatures: [execute(address)]
- calldatas: [0x000000000000000000000000c4421eaf9087aa0b8f453c130dc024c3eb3a34d7]
- withDelegatecalls: [true]
- startBlock: 17075554
- endBlock: 17094754
- strategy: 0xb7e383ef9b1e9189fc0f71fb30af8aa14377429e
- ipfsHash: 0x3153da673854d10ae6350b2508577a1d09d5486269b6501e15a557ec7fd73cb5
Ethereum
Optimism
We have verified the proposal uses correctly the Aave cross-chain governance system to communicate with Optimism.
From a technical perspective, we have verified the proposal payload correctly uses the new BGD's Aave Config Engine of Aave v3 Optimism, in this case, to update the following risk parameters:
- WBTC:
- LTV: 70% -> 73%
- Liquidation Threshold: 75% -> 78%
- Liquidation Bonus: 9.4% -> 8.5%
- DAI:
- LTV: 75% -> 78%
- Liquidation Threshold: 80% -> 83
✅ The code on the proposal payload corresponds to the proposal specification.
✅ The proposal includes a proper tests suite, checking all necessary post-conditions.
✅ BGD reviewed the payload before the proposal was submitted.
✅ Only one payload used via delegatecall
✅ BGD reviewed the procedure followed to submit the proposal.