https://app.aave.com/governance/proposal/?proposalId=164
🔧 📊 params-update
This proposal is an update of risk parameters on Aave v3 Optimism, affecting WBTC and sUSD.
Transaction: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf46f57f5ff00711b4bfd0825e662e8cbb4c7d1d927139be87d7474ac4e9d1cd2
- id: 164
- creator: 0x683a4f9915d6216f73d6df50151725036bd26c02
- executor: 0xee56e2b3d491590b5b31738cc34d5232f378a8d5
- targets: [0x5f5c02875a8e9b5a26fbd09040abcfdeb2aa6711]
- values: [0]
- signatures: [execute(address)]
- calldatas: [0x0000000000000000000000006bce15b789e537f3aba3c60cb183f0e8737f05ec]
- withDelegatecalls: [true]
- startBlock: 16688195
- endBlock: 16707395
- strategy: 0xb7e383ef9b1e9189fc0f71fb30af8aa14377429e
- ipfsHash: 0xa061b1a39bc913a61d79f06a1460a90db70cf205595d8dd4f563b964afbac2ce
The underlying Tenderly simulation infrastructure used by Seatbelt is having some problems, not allowing the report generation. We have double checked everything manually (including ad-hoc simulations) to verify that the proposal payload is correct.
From a technical perspective, we have verified that the proposal payload does the following changes on Aave v3 Optimism, via the Aave cross-chain governance system:
- WBTC:
- Liquidation Bonus: 10% -> 9.4%
- sUSD:
- Liquidation Bonus: 5% -> 5.4%
The proposal payload corresponds to the specification on the governance forum, regarding the Optimism part.
✅ The code on the proposal payload corresponds to the proposal specification.
✅ The proposal includes a proper tests suite, checking all necessary post-conditions.
✅ BGD reviewed the payload before the proposal was submitted.
✅ Only one payload used via delegatecall
❌ BGD reviewed the procedure followed to submit the proposal.