-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance is lower than the results you report. #48
Comments
@zhouyuan888888 |
Thank you for your reply : ). I know finetuning the model on the original pascal voc train set can improve accuracy. But in README you pointed out that the performance of 79.155% and 79.916 % is achieved without finetuning. So I have tried many times to reproduce your results but failed. T_T, So, if I want to reproduce your results, what can I do? It is so strange because I have not modified any your codes or configurations. Thank you so much for your answering! :) |
@zhouyuan888888 |
Yes, I used the pretrained res101 model. So I compare our results based on the res101 version. 79.206 % and 79.916 % are all evaluated by using multi-scale and flip strategies. :) |
@zhouyuan888888 |
I think the gap about 0.7% is a little large. For single-scale test without flipping, I only got about 78.014 % MIoU (yours is about 79.155% ) T_T. By the way, have you ever used any other tracks to further import accuracy? You are so kind, thank you for your quick reply!!! |
@zhouyuan888888 |
Hello, 我和你上述保持同样的参数,包括pretrained res-101.augment pascal voc dataset is downloaded from DrSleep,以及 多尺度测试和裁剪,在4块RTX2080Ti实验。
|
maybe you can try this: https://github.com/SegmentationBLWX/sssegmentation |
By using the default config you provide, I have achieved 79.206 % (your result is 79.916 %) based on deeplabv3+res101 on the pascalvoc validation set. Can you tell me why this happened? By the way:
How can I do to achieve the performance you report in the README.? Thank you for your help~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: