Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vitis Vision Compatibility with xcku035 #202

Open
Mahyar426 opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Vitis Vision Compatibility with xcku035 #202

Mahyar426 opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Mahyar426
Copy link

Hi everyone!

I am using an xcku035 FPGA, which is not listed in the following link:
https://github.com/Xilinx/Vitis_Embedded_Platform_Source/tree/2024.1/Xilinx_Official_Platforms

Is this going to prevent me from using vitis vision library? Because I have everything installed, but when I read the README file, one of the commands was "export PLATFORM=< path-to-platform-directory >/< platform >.xpfm", and I don't have these files on my computer. Can someone help me with this?

Thanks!

@vt-lib-support
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @Mahyar426 ,

If you are trying L2/L3 flow to build xclbin and run on hardware, then yes, you need to have the platform available, before you can begin using the library.

The following tutorials may be of help to you:

https://docs.amd.com/r/en-US/Vitis-Tutorials-Vitis-Platform-Creation/Vitis-Tutorials-Platform-Creation-XD101

If you are trying L1 flow to get latency, resource, timing estimates, then platform is not compulsory. You can just provide the FPGA part name and run any L1 function. Check any L1 Makefile help section to get full info on the usage.

@Mahyar426
Copy link
Author

Can you point to some viable SOC or evalution boards that are platform compatible and feature an XCKU035?

@vt-lib-support
Copy link
Collaborator

There seems to be an evaluation board for Kintex, but with XCKU040 FPGA:

https://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/kcu105.html

But it is suggested to use the boards listed here as they are verified to be compatible and working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants