Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenSearch improvements made during ACW wildbook docker migration #779

Closed
naknomum opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #940
Closed

OpenSearch improvements made during ACW wildbook docker migration #779

naknomum opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #940
Assignees
Labels
enhancement new or improvements on existing features opensearch anything that touches on opensearch
Milestone

Comments

@naknomum
Copy link
Member

naknomum commented Sep 23, 2024

Overview

Some incremental improvements made while observing OpenSearch in the huge database environment of ACW. A dev branch is in progress with these and just needs some final loose ends wrapped up and to be linked to this issue.

Requirements

  • Some exception handling to prevent indexing from dying
  • opensearchSync admin tool now has a startNum parameter (to pick up initial sync at arbitrary point)
  • invalid lat/lon rejected outright (was breaking indexing deep inside geo-point type)
@naknomum naknomum added the enhancement new or improvements on existing features label Sep 23, 2024
@naknomum naknomum self-assigned this Sep 23, 2024
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 added the opensearch anything that touches on opensearch label Oct 30, 2024
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 added this to the 10.6.0 milestone Nov 26, 2024
@TanyaStere42 TanyaStere42 modified the milestones: 10.6.0, 10.5.2 Dec 10, 2024
@naknomum
Copy link
Member Author

these changes have been incorporated into PR940.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement new or improvements on existing features opensearch anything that touches on opensearch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants