You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The use of priority in the trigger attribution algorithm in the case of multiple attributable triggers remains unchanged.
But that proposal indicates that a single report can be derived from multiple triggers, each of which can have a distinct priority, so something about the use of priority must necessarily change in order to implement the proposal. At least, there must be a way to compare two reports, at least one of which may have been derived from more than one trigger.
Additionally, it is unclear whether the scope of prioritization is within a reporting window (as it is today) or within a <reporting window, trigger data> pair.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Flexible event-level configurations explainer says:
But that proposal indicates that a single report can be derived from multiple triggers, each of which can have a distinct priority, so something about the use of priority must necessarily change in order to implement the proposal. At least, there must be a way to compare two reports, at least one of which may have been derived from more than one trigger.
Additionally, it is unclear whether the scope of prioritization is within a reporting window (as it is today) or within a <reporting window, trigger data> pair.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: