Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider adding constraints to generic-to-concrete type substitution #121

Open
pikinier20 opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Consider adding constraints to generic-to-concrete type substitution #121

pikinier20 opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
proposal Proposal for future feature

Comments

@pikinier20
Copy link
Contributor

Example:
With query

<T> T.() -> T

should we return all functions that do:

Typ.() -> Typ

or should we return only functions, where Typ >: Upper-bound
@pikinier20 pikinier20 added the proposal Proposal for future feature label Oct 19, 2020
@KacperFKorban
Copy link
Member

Can't remember the context of this. @pikinier20?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
proposal Proposal for future feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@KacperFKorban @pikinier20