Installing on RHEL-8.9 fails - "nothing provides libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.26)(64bit)"

[dsommers]

This was already resolved once, in issue #1760 but has re-appeared once again.

# yum update
Updating Subscription Management repositories.
download.vscodium.com                                                                          1.5 kB/s | 833  B     00:00    
Error: 
 Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package codium-1.92.2.24228-el8.x86_64
  - nothing provides libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.29)(64bit) needed by codium-1.94.0.24281-el8.x86_64 from gitlab.com_paulcarroty_vscodium_repo
  - nothing provides libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.26)(64bit) needed by codium-1.94.0.24281-el8.x86_64 from gitlab.com_paulcarroty_vscodium_repo
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
# 

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux
• Architecture x86_64
• Version: 8.9
• App Manager: yum/dnf repo using https://download.vscodium.com/rpms/
• Sandboxed: No

[dsommers]

This issue also appeared with codium-1.93.1.24256-el8.x86_64

[daiyam]

Yes, since 1.93, VSCodium uses node-20 which requires glibc-2.29. I didn't expect to affect el8.
The move is due to that I wasn't able to pack the app with node-16 (if I remember correctly due to electron).
But reh and reh-web are still shipping with node-16.

You could use our AppImage (not available in 1.94, yet) or our flatpak.

So I will have to rename el8 to el9...

[dsommers]

Okay, so I have tried the flatpak in the past ... and that sandboxing didn't work well with clangd at all - so lots of the IDE experience was lost. I can give the AppImage a try, but I'm not that happy about that approach - on large applications it takes considerably longer to start the app and it adds tons of various mount bindings.

But I do see that RHEL-8.9 does provide a nodejs:20 module.

# yum module reset nodejs
[...]
# yum module enable nodejs:20
[...]
# yum install nodejs
[...]
# node --version
v20.16.0
# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.10 (Ootpa)

[dsommers]

I now see that I'm running RHEL-8.10, not 8.9 as indicated. But that shouldn't make a big difference either way.

[daiyam]

Node itself isn't necessarily the issue since unofficial builds support glibc-2.17 (https://unofficial-builds.nodejs.org/download/release/) but the libraries used like electron, chromium or node modules with native binaries.

I agree flatpak and AppImage aren't ideal for an IDE.

[OmniBlade]

Upstream still appears to support RHEL8, can you not emulate the way they build and pack the app?