Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

author position in RDF? #179

Open
zednis opened this issue Dec 16, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

author position in RDF? #179

zednis opened this issue Dec 16, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@zednis
Copy link
Contributor

zednis commented Dec 16, 2015

@justgo129 @rewolfe

I was looking at the RDF for contributors and realized that there is no positioning information recorded in the RDF.

## Contributors:
## Person and his/her role in the creation of the entity:
<http://data.globalchange.gov/article/10.1002/2013EO200001>
   prov:qualifiedAttribution [
      a prov:Attribution;
      prov:agent <http://data.globalchange.gov/person/2793>;
      prov:hadRole <http://data.globalchange.gov/role_type/author>;
      prov:actedOnBehalfOf <http://data.globalchange.gov/organization/national-center-atmospheric-research-climate-global-dynamics-division>;
      ] .

I was wondering what your thoughts would be on including author ordering with a datatype property?

gcis:authorOrdering a owl:DatatTypeProperty ;
  rdfs:label "author ordering" ;
  rdfs:range xsd:integer ;
  rdfs:domain prov:Attribution .

example:

## Contributors:
## Person and his/her role in the creation of the entity:
<http://data.globalchange.gov/article/10.1002/2013EO200001>
   prov:qualifiedAttribution [
      a prov:Attribution;
      prov:agent <http://data.globalchange.gov/person/2793>;
      prov:hadRole <http://data.globalchange.gov/role_type/author>;
      prov:actedOnBehalfOf <http://data.globalchange.gov/organization/national-center-atmospheric-research-climate-global-dynamics-division>;
      gcis:authorOrdering "1"^^xsd:integer ;
      ] .

What do you think? This would be easy to add.

@justgo129
Copy link
Contributor

@zednis I'm intrigued by the idea but I'm not sure--with the exception of identifying a first author--that this will fill a need. I don't think delineating the 3rd author as opposed to the fourth would add much value within the RDF.

@zednis
Copy link
Contributor Author

zednis commented Dec 17, 2015

If someone wanted to presentation of the publication from the RDF then they would not be able to correctly order the authors. For example, Hook's faceted search.

As an example, we could not generate the same HTML that GCIS shows for a publication from the RDF we are publishing.

@justgo129
Copy link
Contributor

@zednis how long would this take? The html and turtle files are linked to here. @rewolfe I don't see any ordering of contributors within the html. Am I missing something or is that information contained elsewhere in the database?

@rewolfe
Copy link
Member

rewolfe commented Dec 17, 2015

@zednis - I like this idea. @justgo129 - We have a similar concept for
ordering other resources (e.g. chapters). I think we may need to add a new
field (ordinal) to the contributor table.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:22 AM, justgo129 [email protected] wrote:

@zednis https://github.com/zednis how long would this take? The html
https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis/blob/master/lib/Tuba/files/templates/contributors.html.ep
and turtle
https://github.com/USGCRP/gcis/blob/master/lib/Tuba/files/templates/contributors.ttl.tut
files are linked to here. @rewolfe https://github.com/rewolfe I don't
see any ordering of contributors within the html. Am I missing something or
is that information contained elsewhere in the database?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#179 (comment)
.

Robert Wolfe, NASA GSFC @ USGCRP, o: 202-419-3470, m: 301-257-6966

@justgo129
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good. @zednis let's proceed. Since we may need to add the ordinal to the contributor table anyway, we might as well knock out this issue along with #118 simultaneously.

@zednis
Copy link
Contributor Author

zednis commented Dec 17, 2015

Ok. I'll do a quick first pass on Monday.

@zednis zednis self-assigned this Feb 5, 2016
@zednis
Copy link
Contributor Author

zednis commented Feb 5, 2016

@justgo129 @rewolfe

This issue fell through the cracks. Do you think this ticket should be worked on now or put in the backlog?

@justgo129
Copy link
Contributor

@zednis, backlog

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants