Maximum depth warning missing for weir opening exceeding storage node rim

[MitchHeineman]

The title pretty much says it all. Not a big deal. The example below triggers a warning for a weir below a standard junction, but no warning for an otherwise identically configured weir below a storage node.

[OPTIONS]
FLOW_UNITS           CFS
INFILTRATION         HORTON
FLOW_ROUTING         DYNWAVE
LINK_OFFSETS         DEPTH

START_DATE           12/03/2024
START_TIME           00:00:00
END_DATE             12/03/2024
END_TIME             01:00:00

[JUNCTIONS]
;;Name           Elevation  MaxDepth   InitDepth  SurDepth   Aponded   
;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
WUpstream        1.5        10         0          0          0         
Oupstream        1.5        10         0          0          0         
W2Chamber        1          10         0          0          0         

[OUTFALLS]
;;Name           Elevation  Type       Stage Data       Gated    Route To        
;;-------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------- -------- ----------------
Woutfall         0          FREE                        NO                       
W2outfall        0          FREE                        NO                       

[STORAGE]
;;Name           Elev.    MaxDepth   InitDepth  Shape      Curve Type/Params            SurDepth  Fevap    Psi      Ksat     IMD     
;;-------------- -------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------------------------- --------- --------          -------- --------
WeirChamber      1        10         0          FUNCTIONAL 0          0          1000     0         0       

[CONDUITS]
;;Name           From Node        To Node          Length     Roughness  InOffset   OutOffset  InitFlow   MaxFlow   
;;-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
WUpstreamPipe    WUpstream        WeirChamber      400        0.013      0          0          0          0         
OUpstreamPipe    Oupstream        W2Chamber        400        0.013      0          0          0          0         

[WEIRS]
;;Name           From Node        To Node          Type         CrestHt    Qcoeff     Gated    EndCon   EndCoeff   Surcharge  RoadWidth  RoadSurf   Coeff. Curve
;;-------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------------
Weir             WeirChamber      Woutfall         TRANSVERSE   1.5        3.33       NO       0        0          YES       
Weir2            W2Chamber        W2outfall        TRANSVERSE   1.5        3.33       NO       0        0          YES       

[XSECTIONS]
;;Link           Shape        Geom1            Geom2      Geom3      Geom4      Barrels    Culvert   
;;-------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
WUpstreamPipe    CIRCULAR     5                0          0          0          1                    
OUpstreamPipe    CIRCULAR     5                0          0          0          1                    
Weir             RECT_OPEN    15               4          0          0         
Weir2            RECT_OPEN    15               4          0          0         

[DWF]
;;Node           Constituent      Baseline   Patterns  
;;-------------- ---------------- ---------- ----------
WUpstream        FLOW             25         ""
Oupstream        FLOW             25         ""

[COORDINATES]
;;Node           X-Coord            Y-Coord           
;;-------------- ------------------ ------------------
WUpstream        660.836            7133.139          
Oupstream        695.302            6716.290          
W2Chamber        2400.603           6709.997          
Woutfall         3935.860           7026.239          
W2outfall        3929.710           6653.364          
WeirChamber      2380.952           7113.703          

[dickinsonre]

It probably means sometime in the past the storage rim can change during the simulation. Or maybe the use of a surcharge depth would make this a moot warning message. I have had issues with storage in various versions of SWMM5 as it seems the area is extrapolated when the depth of the depth/area table has different resolutions.