We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Did this with Andrew's data and the BV DS model:
The Jacobs data looks like it does really well but crashes at the higher TSRs. See #44.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the next step? Have you tried getting results past TSR=3.1?
This is very encouraging Pete.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Pete Bachant [email protected] wrote: Did this with Andrew's data and the BV DS model: The Jacobs data looks like it does really well but crashes at the higher TSRs. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
On Jun 28, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Pete Bachant [email protected] wrote:
The Jacobs data looks like it does really well but crashes at the higher TSRs.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Results with the LB DS model:
No branches or pull requests
Did this with Andrew's data and the BV DS model:
The Jacobs data looks like it does really well but crashes at the higher TSRs. See #44.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: