-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Data augmentations/mixup for pseudolabeling #141
Comments
For generating pseudo-labels, I think we should just run it without augs to get an accurate confidence value. For training on it, I think we should always data aug on stuff we're training on. |
@Sean1572 @sprestrelski Thoughts on which data augs to use for finetuning? Based on slack messages data augs seem very necessary |
Open
Open
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Should we use data augmentations/ mixup for finetuning on pseudolabels? I think data augs should be significantly less aggressive for the pseudolabeling. However, do we want that to mean a different set of augs, weaker augs, no augs, or something else entirely?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: