Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
33 lines (27 loc) · 1.28 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

33 lines (27 loc) · 1.28 KB
Raw

Evaluating Representation Learning of Code Changes for Predicting Patch Correctness in Program Repair

@inproceedings{tian2020evaluating, 
  title={Evaluating Representation Learning of Code Changes for Predicting Patch Correctness in Program Repair}, 
  author={Tian, Haoye and Liu, Kui and Kabor{\'e}, Abdoul Kader and Koyuncu, Anil and Li, Li and Klein, Jacques and Bissyand{\'e}, Tegawend{\'e} F.},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering}, 
  year={2020}, 
  publisher={ACM}
}

data

the dataset and results of each experiment.

  • experiemnt1
    • Patches_train.zip: the developer patches as committed in five open source project repositories.
    • APR-Efficiency-PFL: the patches under the folders affixed with '_C'.
  • experiment2
    • The patches to be evaluated from RepairThemAll.
  • experiment3
    • APR-Efficiency-NFL: the patches labeled with affix '_P' and '_C', means 'palusible' and 'correct'.
    • DefectRepairing: the patches labeled with json file.
    • defects4j-developer: the correct patches.

preprocess

preprocess of code file and data generation for RQ1 and RQ2.

similarity_calculation

patch similarity statistics and filetra for RQ1 and RQ2.

prediction

classifier of patch correctness for RQ3.