You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To obtain the Eq.5, you supposed the ls = lt + n, and n is a constant tensor. I am confused with this presumption. Actually, I think this presumption can not be held for each pixel, and Eq.5 is only a very special case.
I wonder if you can help me to better understand your analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for the late reply, because I was busy with other work.
Yes, you are right, this is just an extreme case to illustrate our motivation. It is not common to encounter this situation in a real-world example. We just want to explain the inconsistency between softmax and sigmoid cross-task protocol.
Thanks for your attention to our work!
To obtain the Eq.5, you supposed the ls = lt + n, and n is a constant tensor. I am confused with this presumption. Actually, I think this presumption can not be held for each pixel, and Eq.5 is only a very special case.
I wonder if you can help me to better understand your analysis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: