Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PetMaster issue #116

Open
TheNamesTommy opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

PetMaster issue #116

TheNamesTommy opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
feature A new feature or suggestion. in discussion This feature is currently being discussed internally.

Comments

@TheNamesTommy
Copy link

My feature request is related to a current issue regarding PetMaster on Thronecraft.
The issue is that Crowns can be stored within a pet, which defeats many aspects of RP. My solution would be to edit PetMaster so that crowns cannot be stored in them, similar to how crowns cannot be stored in an enderchest and shulkers. The current state of PetMaster means that banks, vaults, treasuries have no use since people can just store all their valuables in a magic pet that no one else has access to. The removal of this will encourage more RP and will make the server more realistic.
TheNamesTommy

@TheNamesTommy TheNamesTommy added the feature A new feature or suggestion. label Dec 18, 2020
@Brsssh
Copy link

Brsssh commented Dec 19, 2020

The issues with this are:
#1, People paid for petmaster the way it is, and nerfing it like that would cause legal issues as people no longer have what they paid for, and
#2, banks in general aren't really a viable option as a business. People storing all of their money with someone is is just asking for theft. Especially considering someone could break into one bank vault only needing theft permission against the owner of the bank with the same difficulty as breaking into someone's house, only to have a much larger rewards, whereas to get the same result from stealing from individual people a they would need to obtain hostile perms against each person, pick the same number of locks, and find where each person has hidden their money. All of that to say that banks are not a viable arguement for this, making the only reasoning for this to make theft easier. That being said, the original reason crowns were disallowed in enderchests and shulkers was to prevent people from carrying them between characters, now that that is no longer against the rules, if anything crowns should be allowed to be stored in ender chests and shulkers to balance out the pets as opposed to reducing the value of something many people already paid a signifigant amount of money for

@Benlier
Copy link

Benlier commented Dec 20, 2020

#1, People paid for petmaster the way it is, and nerfing it like that would cause legal issues as people no longer have what they paid for, and

The description of the petmaster store item doesn't even hint at being able to store coins. The closest thing is "You will be able to catch monsters in the world of Thronecraft and tame them.", of which the implementation is up to the server.
Actually having the only safe option to store your coins be through the bought rank pet master, which you seem to be implying, would be a real cause of legal issues

@Brsssh
Copy link

Brsssh commented Dec 21, 2020

That’s why I suggested removing the restriction on enderchests and shulkers. The only reason those where restricted from holding crowns was due to it being against the rules to transfer money between characters, and staffs inability to check these things if they were suspicious of a player doing that. So far as I know it is now allowed to transfer money between characters and thanks to you Ben you can now check peoples pets and e chests and the like. Despite it not being a listed benefit, that doesn’t mean people didn’t buy it for that purpose, and definitely doesn’t mean it should be made impossible to safely store things. At that rate you might as well completely remove inventories because it isn’t fair I can store my tools where someone can’t steal them. You might as well remove access to ender chests as well.

@jvdoorn jvdoorn added the in discussion This feature is currently being discussed internally. label Dec 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature or suggestion. in discussion This feature is currently being discussed internally.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants