-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
/
1ixL.txt
482 lines (434 loc) · 28.7 KB
/
1ixL.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 8.11 (jessie)
Release: 8.11
Codename: jessie
Architecture: armhf
Uptime: 19:40:52 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 0.38, 0.14
Linux 3.10.106+ (gamestation-turbo) 27/07/18 _armv7l_ (8 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
2.90 0.07 6.88 1.36 0.00 88.79
Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
mmcblk0 169.72 7721.11 100.54 597691 7782
mmcblk0boot1 0.71 2.84 0.00 220 0
mmcblk0boot0 0.71 2.84 0.00 220 0
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1.9G 953M 1.0G 22M 27M 566M
-/+ buffers/cache: 359M 1.6G
Swap: 0B 0B 0B
##########################################################################
Executing tinymembench on a little core:
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 209.3 MB/s (0.5%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 277.6 MB/s
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 290.1 MB/s
C copy : 281.8 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 514.8 MB/s (2.6%)
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 638.5 MB/s (0.1%)
C 2-pass copy : 268.6 MB/s (0.4%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 371.9 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 408.9 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill : 784.7 MB/s (0.4%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 783.8 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 503.8 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 502.6 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 339.7 MB/s (3.3%)
standard memset : 755.6 MB/s (2.8%)
---
NEON read : 504.8 MB/s
NEON read prefetched (32 bytes step) : 908.1 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON read prefetched (64 bytes step) : 991.2 MB/s (1.0%)
NEON read 2 data streams : 436.1 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON read 2 data streams prefetched (32 bytes step) : 935.3 MB/s
NEON read 2 data streams prefetched (64 bytes step) : 987.6 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON copy : 289.5 MB/s
NEON copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 642.2 MB/s (0.8%)
NEON copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 644.3 MB/s
NEON unrolled copy : 267.9 MB/s
NEON unrolled copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 426.6 MB/s (1.0%)
NEON unrolled copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 632.5 MB/s
NEON copy backwards : 281.7 MB/s
NEON copy backwards prefetched (32 bytes step) : 640.3 MB/s
NEON copy backwards prefetched (64 bytes step) : 644.3 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON 2-pass copy : 280.0 MB/s (3.5%)
NEON 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 397.5 MB/s
NEON 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 423.7 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy : 263.5 MB/s (0.6%)
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 357.1 MB/s
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 389.8 MB/s
NEON fill : 783.9 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON fill backwards : 782.6 MB/s
VFP copy : 269.4 MB/s (0.6%)
VFP 2-pass copy : 266.4 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM fill (STRD) : 757.1 MB/s (0.7%)
ARM fill (STM with 8 registers) : 784.6 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM fill (STM with 4 registers) : 783.7 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM copy prefetched (incr pld) : 641.5 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM copy prefetched (wrap pld) : 640.8 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM 2-pass copy prefetched (incr pld) : 397.9 MB/s (3.2%)
ARM 2-pass copy prefetched (wrap pld) : 385.1 MB/s (3.5%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON read (from framebuffer) : 68.0 MB/s
NEON copy (from framebuffer) : 67.4 MB/s
NEON 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 61.7 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON unrolled copy (from framebuffer) : 63.2 MB/s
NEON 2-pass unrolled copy (from framebuffer) : 60.9 MB/s (0.1%)
VFP copy (from framebuffer) : 299.7 MB/s (2.1%)
VFP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 275.7 MB/s (0.6%)
ARM copy (from framebuffer) : 256.6 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 188.3 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.1 ns
65536 : 4.2 ns / 7.6 ns
131072 : 6.6 ns / 11.1 ns
262144 : 7.9 ns / 13.0 ns
524288 : 13.8 ns / 22.3 ns
1048576 : 82.2 ns / 126.3 ns
2097152 : 121.1 ns / 165.3 ns
4194304 : 141.3 ns / 179.8 ns
8388608 : 152.9 ns / 187.1 ns
16777216 : 161.8 ns / 195.9 ns
33554432 : 170.4 ns / 208.6 ns
67108864 : 183.3 ns / 231.8 ns
Executing tinymembench on a big core:
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 1144.4 MB/s
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 1154.7 MB/s (4.5%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2265.0 MB/s (3.5%)
C copy : 1178.7 MB/s (0.2%)
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1361.3 MB/s (4.6%)
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1360.6 MB/s (0.3%)
C 2-pass copy : 1094.7 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1323.2 MB/s (4.8%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1313.4 MB/s
C fill : 4828.3 MB/s (0.5%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 1700.1 MB/s (4.3%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 1699.9 MB/s (0.4%)
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 1795.2 MB/s (0.4%)
---
standard memcpy : 2203.7 MB/s
standard memset : 4796.8 MB/s (3.5%)
---
NEON read : 3272.7 MB/s (0.5%)
NEON read prefetched (32 bytes step) : 4166.3 MB/s (1.8%)
NEON read prefetched (64 bytes step) : 4173.0 MB/s (0.8%)
NEON read 2 data streams : 3296.6 MB/s (5.2%)
NEON read 2 data streams prefetched (32 bytes step) : 4205.1 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON read 2 data streams prefetched (64 bytes step) : 4209.8 MB/s
NEON copy : 2513.5 MB/s (5.8%)
NEON copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2822.4 MB/s (0.6%)
NEON copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2777.6 MB/s
NEON unrolled copy : 2164.7 MB/s (4.4%)
NEON unrolled copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 3129.0 MB/s (2.2%)
NEON unrolled copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 3147.8 MB/s (2.0%)
NEON copy backwards : 1190.3 MB/s (3.9%)
NEON copy backwards prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1340.6 MB/s
NEON copy backwards prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1349.1 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON 2-pass copy : 2006.0 MB/s (7.0%)
NEON 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2177.7 MB/s
NEON 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2182.9 MB/s
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy : 1355.5 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1682.5 MB/s (5.5%)
NEON unrolled 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1696.8 MB/s (1.1%)
NEON fill : 4782.6 MB/s (0.4%)
NEON fill backwards : 1733.7 MB/s (4.4%)
VFP copy : 2595.6 MB/s (0.6%)
VFP 2-pass copy : 1321.3 MB/s
ARM fill (STRD) : 4797.8 MB/s (5.1%)
ARM fill (STM with 8 registers) : 4785.8 MB/s (0.3%)
ARM fill (STM with 4 registers) : 4779.5 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM copy prefetched (incr pld) : 2824.2 MB/s (10.5%)
ARM copy prefetched (wrap pld) : 2682.6 MB/s (0.5%)
ARM 2-pass copy prefetched (incr pld) : 1591.2 MB/s (5.1%)
ARM 2-pass copy prefetched (wrap pld) : 1567.2 MB/s (0.4%)
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON read (from framebuffer) : 455.3 MB/s (1.3%)
NEON copy (from framebuffer) : 407.5 MB/s
NEON 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 411.0 MB/s (2.3%)
NEON unrolled copy (from framebuffer) : 326.7 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON 2-pass unrolled copy (from framebuffer) : 352.5 MB/s
VFP copy (from framebuffer) : 378.5 MB/s
VFP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 361.3 MB/s (2.8%)
ARM copy (from framebuffer) : 364.8 MB/s
ARM 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 334.3 MB/s (0.2%)
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.7 ns / 7.1 ns
131072 : 7.1 ns / 9.4 ns
262144 : 10.1 ns / 12.5 ns
524288 : 11.7 ns / 14.2 ns
1048576 : 12.7 ns / 15.3 ns
2097152 : 22.8 ns / 29.6 ns
4194304 : 98.2 ns / 148.1 ns
8388608 : 136.7 ns / 189.1 ns
16777216 : 156.6 ns / 208.2 ns
33554432 : 171.8 ns / 224.4 ns
67108864 : 181.5 ns / 237.2 ns
##########################################################################
##########################################################################
7-Zip (A) 9.20 Copyright (c) 1999-2010 Igor Pavlov 2010-11-18
p7zip Version 9.20 (locale=en_GB.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,8 CPUs)
RAM size: 1990 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 1701 MB, # Benchmark threads: 8
Dict Compressing | Decompressing
Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KB/s % MIPS MIPS | KB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 5585 669 812 5433 | 89558 662 1220 8077
23: 5329 691 786 5430 | 83995 636 1207 7684
24: 5497 743 795 5911 | 84412 653 1198 7830
25: 4994 700 815 5702 | 82902 659 1182 7795
----------------------------------------------------------------
Avr: 700 802 5619 653 1202 7846
Tot: 677 1002 6733
Compression: 5619
Decompression: 7846
Total: 6733
##########################################################################
OpenSSL 1.0.1t 3 May 2016 (Library: OpenSSL 1.0.2l 25 May 2017)
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-cbc 26810.76k 32876.07k 34800.21k 35271.00k 35154.60k
aes-128-cbc 74115.00k 84873.98k 89295.36k 90379.61k 90753.71k
aes-192-cbc 23935.85k 28036.29k 29783.47k 30124.71k 30283.09k
aes-192-cbc 65578.05k 73527.42k 76904.36k 77431.81k 78047.91k
aes-256-cbc 21616.54k 25164.07k 26276.86k 26534.23k 26656.77k
aes-256-cbc 58102.18k 64692.16k 67346.69k 67993.26k 68192.94k
##########################################################################
System health while running tinymembench:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
19:40:52: 2000/1400MHz 1.00 11% 6% 2% 0% 1% 0% 61.0°C
19:41:52: 1900/1400MHz 1.30 11% 1% 10% 0% 0% 0% 51.0°C
19:42:52: 1900/1400MHz 1.41 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 51.0°C
19:43:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.15 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
19:44:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.24 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
19:45:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.20 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
19:46:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.25 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
19:47:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.19 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
19:48:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.07 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
19:49:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.09 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
19:50:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.42 21% 1% 12% 6% 0% 0% 50.0°C
19:51:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.25 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
19:52:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.16 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
19:53:53: 1900/1400MHz 1.06 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
19:54:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.07 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 61.0°C
19:55:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.09 14% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 60.0°C
19:56:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.18 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 61.0°C
19:57:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.19 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 55.0°C
19:58:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.59 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 54.0°C
19:59:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.51 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 53.0°C
20:00:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.41 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 53.0°C
20:01:54: 1900/1400MHz 1.38 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 53.0°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
20:02:24: 1900/1400MHz 1.23 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 54.0°C
20:02:39: 1900/1400MHz 2.11 14% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:02:54: 1900/1400MHz 2.61 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:03:09: 1900/1400MHz 3.81 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:03:24: 1900/1400MHz 4.73 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:03:39: 1900/1400MHz 5.46 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:03:54: 1900/1400MHz 6.09 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:04:09: 1900/1400MHz 5.63 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:04:25: 1900/1400MHz 5.34 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:04:40: 1900/1400MHz 5.12 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:04:55: 1900/1400MHz 5.02 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:05:10: 1900/1400MHz 5.68 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:05:25: 1900/1400MHz 6.19 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:05:40: 1900/1400MHz 6.59 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:05:55: 1900/1400MHz 6.97 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:06:10: 1900/1400MHz 6.19 13% 1% 11% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:06:25: 1900/1400MHz 5.84 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:06:40: 1900/1400MHz 5.43 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:06:55: 1900/1400MHz 5.26 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:07:10: 1900/1400MHz 5.19 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:07:26: 1900/1400MHz 4.93 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:07:41: 1900/1400MHz 4.80 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:07:56: 1900/1400MHz 4.63 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:08:11: 1900/1400MHz 4.87 14% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:08:26: 1900/1400MHz 5.57 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:08:41: 1900/1400MHz 6.11 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:08:56: 1900/1400MHz 6.67 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:09:11: 1900/1400MHz 7.05 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:09:26: 1900/1400MHz 6.24 13% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:09:41: 1900/1400MHz 5.81 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:09:56: 1900/1400MHz 5.56 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:10:11: 1900/1400MHz 5.28 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:10:26: 1900/1400MHz 5.22 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:10:42: 1900/1400MHz 5.17 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:10:57: 1900/1400MHz 4.91 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:11:12: 1900/1400MHz 4.77 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:11:27: 1900/1400MHz 4.67 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:11:42: 1900/1400MHz 4.91 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:11:57: 1900/1400MHz 4.86 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:12:12: 1900/1400MHz 4.75 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.0°C
20:12:27: 1900/1400MHz 4.73 14% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
20:12:45: 1900/1400MHz 5.29 38% 12% 10% 0% 15% 1% 52.0°C
20:13:01: 1900/1400MHz 6.15 35% 11% 9% 0% 12% 1% 54.0°C
20:13:17: 1900/1400MHz 6.36 35% 11% 10% 0% 12% 0% 55.0°C
20:13:33: 1900/1400MHz 6.14 37% 12% 9% 0% 14% 0% 52.0°C
20:13:56: 1900/1400MHz 9.74 49% 6% 2% 0% 39% 0% 51.0°C
20:14:11: 1900/1400MHz 8.84 19% 4% 11% 0% 2% 0% 58.0°C
20:14:26: 1900/1400MHz 8.65 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:14:41: 1900/1400MHz 8.51 14% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:14:56: 1900/1400MHz 7.94 14% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 57.0°C
20:15:11: 1900/1400MHz 7.72 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:15:26: 1900/1400MHz 7.71 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:15:41: 1900/1400MHz 7.86 14% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:15:56: 1900/1400MHz 8.05 14% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:16:11: 1900/1400MHz 7.29 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 57.0°C
20:16:26: 1900/1400MHz 6.77 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:16:41: 1900/1400MHz 6.29 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:16:57: 1900/1400MHz 6.32 15% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:17:12: 1900/1400MHz 6.69 14% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:17:27: 1900/1400MHz 6.98 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:17:42: 1900/1400MHz 6.27 13% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:17:57: 1900/1400MHz 5.98 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:18:12: 1900/1400MHz 5.69 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:18:27: 1900/1400MHz 5.39 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 57.0°C
20:18:42: 1900/1400MHz 5.23 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
20:18:57: 1900/1400MHz 5.16 13% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 58.0°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
20:19:35: 1900/1400MHz 6.72 15% 1% 11% 0% 1% 0% 57.0°C
20:20:08: 1900/1400MHz 7.45 58% 4% 52% 0% 1% 0% 90.0°C
20:20:38: 1900/1400MHz 7.73 82% 4% 77% 0% 0% 0% 90.0°C
20:21:09: 1900/1400MHz 9.54 91% 6% 82% 0% 0% 0% 90.0°C
20:21:40: 1900/1400MHz 11.21 81% 4% 76% 0% 0% 0% 73.0°C
20:22:16: 1900/1400MHz 10.40 92% 7% 84% 0% 0% 0% 90.0°C
20:22:46: 900/1400MHz 9.58 81% 5% 75% 0% 0% 0% 88.0°C
20:23:17: 1900/1400MHz 8.46 82% 5% 77% 0% 0% 0% 88.0°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
20:23:31: 1900/1400MHz 8.87 21% 2% 17% 0% 1% 0% 73.0°C
20:23:41: 1900/1400MHz 7.66 12% 6% 0% 0% 5% 0% 59.0°C
20:23:51: 1900/1400MHz 6.64 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 57.0°C
20:24:01: 1900/1400MHz 5.77 14% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 66.0°C
20:24:11: 1900/1400MHz 5.04 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 61.0°C
20:24:21: 1900/1400MHz 4.42 14% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 56.0°C
20:24:31: 1900/1400MHz 3.89 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 65.0°C
20:24:41: 1900/1400MHz 3.45 14% 1% 12% 0% 0% 0% 59.0°C
20:24:52: 1900/1400MHz 3.15 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 54.0°C
20:25:02: 1900/1400MHz 2.89 14% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 64.0°C
##########################################################################
Linux 3.10.106+ (gamestation-turbo) 27/07/18 _armv7l_ (8 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
17.42 0.18 2.24 1.16 0.00 79.00
Device: tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_read kB_wrtn
mmcblk0 60.24 2903.64 7.66 7948805 20967
mmcblk0boot1 0.02 0.08 0.00 220 0
mmcblk0boot0 0.02 0.08 0.00 220 0
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1.9G 878M 1.1G 23M 5.8M 513M
-/+ buffers/cache: 359M 1.6G
Swap: 0B 0B 0B
Filename Type Size Used Priority