Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request - Crafttweaker support for recipes #292

Open
Fireztonez opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Request - Crafttweaker support for recipes #292

Fireztonez opened this issue Aug 1, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Fireztonez
Copy link

Hello,
I want to know if this is possible to add crafttweaker support, question of being able to add or remove easely Mana Recipes and Fire Recipes.

Crafttweaker support when you hjave a lot of recipes to change, or add, and pretty mutch every mods now have Crafttweaker support, so, this is easy to see all recipes directly in one folder and very easy to edit... Yes JSON recipes is good for one or 2, but, this is a pain to maintain when you have a lot of recipes, like in most good modapcks (ex: Project Ozone 3 (And this is nothing compare the the titan or Kappa version...), SevTech, SkyFactory 4, etc)!!

https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/crafttweaker
https://crafttweaker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

Thank's

@SaadArdati
Copy link
Collaborator

Mana and Fire recipes are all configurable through JSONs under config/wizardry/

@Fireztonez
Copy link
Author

I know, but, like I said, I ask if this is possible to add a Crafttweaker support... JSONs recipes is not like crafttweaker at all... Crattweaker have a lot more advanced possibility, by example: create multiples recipes using a loops, array variables, functions, and a lot lot more... this is like comparing an F1 can with a bike... JSON recipes is a real mess when you ahve a lot, and is absolutly not easy and not fun for modpack dev to work with it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants