Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add complex types to java_integration_test.go #2357

Closed
stuartwdouglas opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2656
Closed

Add complex types to java_integration_test.go #2357

stuartwdouglas opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2656
Assignees
@tomdaffurn
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers jvm

Comments

@stuartwdouglas
Copy link
Collaborator

stuartwdouglas commented Aug 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This is still missing a few cases that may or may not work:

  • Map<String, SomeComplexObject>
  • List<SomeComplexObject>
  • Arbitrary parameterized types

These may work out of the box, but we need to test this.
@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Issue needs triaging label Aug 14, 2024
@ftl-robot ftl-robot mentioned this issue Aug 14, 2024
Open
@gak gak removed the triage Issue needs triaging label Aug 14, 2024
@ftl-robot ftl-robot mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2024
Open
@stuartwdouglas stuartwdouglas added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Sep 5, 2024
@tomdaffurn tomdaffurn self-assigned this Sep 6, 2024
@tomdaffurn tomdaffurn mentioned this issue Sep 12, 2024
Merged
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2024
@tomdaffurn
chore: test complex types across runtimes (#2656)
ed06fbe 
Closes #2357 

One test is disabled pending #2651
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tomdaffurn tomdaffurn

Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers jvm
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

chore: test complex types across runtimes TBD54566975/ftl
3 participants
@gak @stuartwdouglas @tomdaffurn