Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

POWF - to make the expenseClass optional #307

Open
rmathew1011 opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #310
Open

POWF - to make the expenseClass optional #307

rmathew1011 opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #310
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rmathew1011
Copy link
Contributor

rmathew1011 commented Sep 28, 2023

We have had another change due to using all of the money in an endowment fund, and with the new fund it does not require an expense class. The vendor made the change in the MARC records for this one account, but the job is failing in PO workflow process. I believe it is because there is no expense class. All our other records/accounts that use the PO workflow have expense classes. So, my guess is that the workflow has the expense class set to required. Is there a way for you to make the expense field not required?

POWF_expenseClass

In the MARC record, the fund is in the 980$b field and the expense class is in the 980$y field.

=980 \$busergen$c99994569726$g565750$kUSD$m189.00$nCarolyn Biery, [email protected] (Originally print PDA)$q1$sAcqMono Conventional$tPurchase at vendor system$uVendor order reference number$vZYBP$ySelectors - electronic$zElectronic resource

With the change, we no longer have an expense class in every record (it’s not required). The $y is empty in some records.

=980 \$bmomclub$c99994568968$g565759$kUSD$m836.00$nAzile Nelson, [email protected]$oPSAA 643 Fall 2023 (upgrade)$pPSAA;643;;$q1$sAcqMono Conventional$tPurchase at vendor system$uVendor order reference number$vZYBP$y $zElectronic resource

Let me know what you find when you have time to investigate this, and also let me know if you have any questions for me.

Thank you!

Shannon

Jeremy has provided with suggestions:
" I have not looked at/ thought about it in great detail. But it seems to me that we need to make sure that
The PO form allows us to submit it without the expense class
At no point in the flow of the WF logic do we require the expense class to be present"

@rmathew1011 rmathew1011 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 28, 2023
@kaladay
Copy link
Contributor

kaladay commented Oct 2, 2023

POWF = Purchase Order Workflow.

@kaladay kaladay self-assigned this Oct 6, 2023
@kaladay
Copy link
Contributor

kaladay commented Oct 6, 2023

Use Statistical Code: ybpetext.
Use Fiscal Year Code: FY2024.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: ⛵ Deploying
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants