-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
POWF - to make the expenseClass optional #307
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
POWF = Purchase Order Workflow. |
Use Statistical Code: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We have had another change due to using all of the money in an endowment fund, and with the new fund it does not require an expense class. The vendor made the change in the MARC records for this one account, but the job is failing in PO workflow process. I believe it is because there is no expense class. All our other records/accounts that use the PO workflow have expense classes. So, my guess is that the workflow has the expense class set to required. Is there a way for you to make the expense field not required?
In the MARC record, the fund is in the 980$b field and the expense class is in the 980$y field.
=980 \$busergen$c99994569726$g565750$kUSD$m189.00$nCarolyn Biery, [email protected] (Originally print PDA)$q1$sAcqMono Conventional$tPurchase at vendor system$uVendor order reference number$vZYBP$ySelectors - electronic$zElectronic resource
With the change, we no longer have an expense class in every record (it’s not required). The $y is empty in some records.
=980 \$bmomclub$c99994568968$g565759$kUSD$m836.00$nAzile Nelson, [email protected]$oPSAA 643 Fall 2023 (upgrade)$pPSAA;643;;$q1$sAcqMono Conventional$tPurchase at vendor system$uVendor order reference number$vZYBP$y $zElectronic resource
Let me know what you find when you have time to investigate this, and also let me know if you have any questions for me.
Thank you!
Shannon
Jeremy has provided with suggestions:
" I have not looked at/ thought about it in great detail. But it seems to me that we need to make sure that
The PO form allows us to submit it without the expense class
At no point in the flow of the WF logic do we require the expense class to be present"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: