You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been experimenting with your VIS model and I've encountered an issue that I hope you can help me clarify.
I trained the model on a server equipped with eight V100-32GB GPUs using the mfvis_nococo/scripts/train_8gpu_mask2former_r50_video.sh script, without any modifications to the parameters. The test results I obtained on the YTVIS2019 validation set are as follows:
For comparison, I also tested the trained weight you provided on the same YTVIS2019 validation set and obtained these results:
As you can see, there is a minor difference in the mAP scores. I was unable to achieve the mAP=42.5 as reported in your documentation. Could you please provide some insight as to why this discrepancy might be occurring?
I appreciate your time and look forward to your response. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
SkyKingL
changed the title
Why can't I successfully get the effect of mAP=42.5 as yours?
Discrepancy in mAP Results between Provided Model and Self-Trained Model on YTVIS2019 Validation Set
Feb 14, 2024
Hello,
I've been experimenting with your VIS model and I've encountered an issue that I hope you can help me clarify.
I trained the model on a server equipped with eight V100-32GB GPUs using the
mfvis_nococo/scripts/train_8gpu_mask2former_r50_video.sh
script, without any modifications to the parameters. The test results I obtained on the YTVIS2019 validation set are as follows:For comparison, I also tested the trained weight you provided on the same YTVIS2019 validation set and obtained these results:
As you can see, there is a minor difference in the mAP scores. I was unable to achieve the
mAP=42.5
as reported in your documentation. Could you please provide some insight as to why this discrepancy might be occurring?I appreciate your time and look forward to your response. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: