You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The GitHub Action workflows that are set up in the repository are informative. They have highlighted accidental mistakes and typos upon which corrective actions were decided to be followed. However, they are mostly limited to model structure and file format. Only more recently have functional checks been added, i.e., metabolic task checks.
What seems to be still missing are more diverse Action workflows around simulations. More recently, this discussed in the release review of 1.17. The way I see it, these are very important, as they would act as a mirror of the changes in the dynamic behavior the model as a result of the changes that are being introduced.
If there were a super easy way to do this, it would have already been done. My aim here is to make a first step and open the discussion, hoping to reach some actionable conclusions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would start from #675
Later, it'd be more interested in running FVA with COBREXA, but for that a model extraction/contextualization method needs to be used, e.g., tINIT and the like.
The GitHub Action workflows that are set up in the repository are informative. They have highlighted accidental mistakes and typos upon which corrective actions were decided to be followed. However, they are mostly limited to model structure and file format. Only more recently have functional checks been added, i.e., metabolic task checks.
What seems to be still missing are more diverse Action workflows around simulations. More recently, this discussed in the release review of 1.17. The way I see it, these are very important, as they would act as a mirror of the changes in the dynamic behavior the model as a result of the changes that are being introduced.
If there were a super easy way to do this, it would have already been done. My aim here is to make a first step and open the discussion, hoping to reach some actionable conclusions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: