Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Filter artwork downloads by author(s) #434

Open
solidprinciples opened this issue Jan 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: Filter artwork downloads by author(s) #434

solidprinciples opened this issue Jan 22, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@solidprinciples
Copy link

solidprinciples commented Jan 22, 2023

It'd be nice to have similar grids styled the same - I.E, automatically pulled from an author that has shared many in the same style. Makes more a more cohesive, immersive experience. :)

Upvote & Fund

  • We're using Polar.sh so you can upvote and help fund this issue.
  • We receive the funding once the issue is completed & confirmed by you.
  • Thank you in advance for helping prioritize & fund our backlog.
Fund with Polar
@cbartondock
Copy link
Collaborator

I could add this, but are there really authors who have produced enough grids to make this viable? If you filter by author you probably would end up with no grids for most of your games no?

@mbaran5
Copy link

mbaran5 commented Aug 23, 2023

N64 as an example has an entire library by one author with a common look and feel.

@LegendAF
Copy link

LegendAF commented Aug 15, 2024

This would be a huge time saving feature for sure. Ideally it would give you the option to weight it towards certain Authors.

For example take N64: ['Vaudeville Villain', 'FattestWrestlingFan', 'DebonairTBS'] this would ideally select the ones created by those authors in that order. If they are not found, then default to however it is selected today.

It would also need to be by artwork type I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants