You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For 7,000 spots, it took approximately 4 hours. However, for 30,000 spots, it has been running for more than 48 hours and hasn't finished yet. Does anyone have insights into why it takes so long, or did I miss some parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for raising the question.
Yes, indeed, it takes so long. That's because we directly use the SpatialDE method, and it does some matrix operation straightforward. When the dimension goes higher, it will require significantly more computation.
Maybe we will make update later on this part if we figure out some ways to increase the scalability.
@jackywangtj66 I wonder if an update could be made to use VisiumHD? Visium works fine, but still quite slow. Now with VisiumHD we can get from 100k to 650k + barcodes (spots) since they're now 2 micron instead of the old 55 micron so SpatialDM is pretty much unusable with VisiumHD data at this stage (keeps throwing memory issues, etc)
I ran the 'Spatial Clustering of Local Spots' step using the following code:
For 7,000 spots, it took approximately 4 hours. However, for 30,000 spots, it has been running for more than 48 hours and hasn't finished yet. Does anyone have insights into why it takes so long, or did I miss some parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: