You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by freeyssu September 3, 2024
I usually use with - items statement for parallel process.
I found out that a failed job with concurrency: 1 config causes that task is termiated immediately even though uncompleted items in loop still remains.
This is my sampe code.
When svr1 is failed with concurrency: 1, the workflow doesn 't run the action for the remained 2 items svr2 and svr3. My expectation is that the task completes all 3 items in loop and then mark FAIL result as the first item is failed.
In case of concurrency: 2 or having bigger value, the workflow executes all 3 items and then marks task FAIL result. This is what I expected.
Discussed in #6232
Originally posted by freeyssu September 3, 2024
I usually use
with - items
statement for parallel process.I found out that a failed job with
concurrency: 1
config causes that task is termiated immediately even though uncompleted items in loop still remains.This is my sampe code.
When
svr1
is failed withconcurrency: 1
, the workflow doesn 't run the action for the remained 2 itemssvr2
andsvr3
. My expectation is that the task completes all 3 items in loop and then mark FAIL result as the first item is failed.In case of
concurrency: 2
or having bigger value, the workflow executes all 3 items and then marks task FAIL result. This is what I expected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: