You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am doing a force sensing project using the qpinversesolver and force point actuator. By referring to the cpp code in the git repo, I found that I am unable to decompose the force result in the X, Y, and Z axes.
If I set 6 force-point actuators to the same point and specify the direction they will need to solve to [1,0,0], [-1,0,0], [0,1,0], [0,-1,0], [0,0,1], [0,0,-1] (which I expect them to give me results on ± X, ±Y, and ±Z), the mesh model will just disappear in the GUI if I click Animation.
If I set 1 force-point actuator and didn't specify the solving direction, which, according to the docs, the actuator will solve in the norm direction of ROI, the results would make sense, but I would be unable to decompose the force.
So I am thinking if the solver is solving the force in the norm of ROI, is there a way that we also get the direction vector of norm of ROI so we can decompose the force in ± X, ±Y, and ±Z? Or there are some other smarter ways that I am missing.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi guys,
I am doing a force sensing project using the qpinversesolver and force point actuator. By referring to the cpp code in the git repo, I found that I am unable to decompose the force result in the X, Y, and Z axes.
If I set 6 force-point actuators to the same point and specify the direction they will need to solve to [1,0,0], [-1,0,0], [0,1,0], [0,-1,0], [0,0,1], [0,0,-1] (which I expect them to give me results on ± X, ±Y, and ±Z), the mesh model will just disappear in the GUI if I click Animation.
If I set 1 force-point actuator and didn't specify the solving direction, which, according to the docs, the actuator will solve in the norm direction of ROI, the results would make sense, but I would be unable to decompose the force.
So I am thinking if the solver is solving the force in the norm of ROI, is there a way that we also get the direction vector of norm of ROI so we can decompose the force in ± X, ±Y, and ±Z? Or there are some other smarter ways that I am missing.
Thanks for your time and assistance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions