You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A problem with using analytics threshold for gamma is that the values below that are set to zero, which, when showing it in Slicer in such a way that the background is transparent makes the values under the threshold also transparent. A possible solution is to use Epsilon (=very small value) insead of 0 for values under analysis threshold.
This could be implemented in Plastimatch gamma as a flag in the algorithm called UseEpsilonValuesUnderAnalysisThreshold or similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Kevin Alexander's clarification:
"When performing the gamma using a threshold dose value (i.e. 40% of maximum dose in the plandose), the resulting gamma distribution has black holes where gamma wasn't calculated. It would be nice to have it set to 0 (i.e. green) even though the gamma technically wasn't computed in those voxels (where the dose is less than the threshold). Make sense? I can generate some screengrabs tomorrow if that would help."
A problem with using analytics threshold for gamma is that the values below that are set to zero, which, when showing it in Slicer in such a way that the background is transparent makes the values under the threshold also transparent. A possible solution is to use Epsilon (=very small value) insead of 0 for values under analysis threshold.
This could be implemented in Plastimatch gamma as a flag in the algorithm called UseEpsilonValuesUnderAnalysisThreshold or similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: