We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To support visual regression testing, I am requesting a new feature.
ImageSharp already contains Image comparison in the Test namespace located here: https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/tree/master/tests/ImageSharp.Tests/TestUtilities/ImageComparison
These methods call internal methods in the main ImageSharp library and so I'm currently resorting to reflection to do this.
Could these be moved to a separate NuGet library for public consumption?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@SaltyDH cool that you are interested in this! :)
Unfortunately, these classes are kinda messy, and need a lot of refactor before making them public. We can only take care of this past 1.0.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Get a real acceptance test working for composed images
90c2194
-Pull out the random instantiation to a higher level function so it can be passed in from the testing code -Implement an image comparison utility because that isn't provided by ImageSharp yet. See SixLabors/ImageSharp#794. Implementation based on https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/blob/9ab02b6ee67b25fd3653146c069dab3687fc0ac8/tests/ImageSharp.Tests/TestUtilities/ImageComparison/TolerantImageComparer.cs
No branches or pull requests
To support visual regression testing, I am requesting a new feature.
ImageSharp already contains Image comparison in the Test namespace located here:
https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/tree/master/tests/ImageSharp.Tests/TestUtilities/ImageComparison
These methods call internal methods in the main ImageSharp library and so I'm currently resorting to reflection to do this.
Could these be moved to a separate NuGet library for public consumption?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: