Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make older versions of your library available #68

Open
kletzander opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Make older versions of your library available #68

kletzander opened this issue Nov 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@kletzander
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Yes, we are using your library in our project, but every time you release newer version you also remove older versions from jitpack repository, which breaks our pipeline. We upgraded to newer version every time, but now, with 1.1.0 you force us to use material3, but that would enforce massive refactor to whole application.

Describe the solution you'd like
It is a good habit to keep older versions of the library available for those who don't need new features or those like us, who can't afford immediate refactor of application to material3.

Describe alternatives you've considered
As this aggressive change broke our pipeline completely, I have no other option than to remove this library from our dependencies and consider it to be a bad idea and not reliable source for future dependencies.

@kletzander kletzander changed the title Support older versions of your library Make older versions of your library available Nov 28, 2024
@mdhanif-simformsolutions
Copy link
Collaborator

mdhanif-simformsolutions commented Nov 28, 2024

Hello @kletzander , apologies for unexpected error. I did have a quick look into this to get this resolved asap.
We usually do not remove any artifacts from the jitpack repository. But it seems like a known issue from Jitpack side where some of the old packages gets lost. Here's the mentioned issue link for the same :- jitpack/jitpack.io#5289

Please keep supporting this and let us know if you have any other queries or suggestions.
Thanks.

@kletzander
Copy link
Author

kletzander commented Dec 16, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants