Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the boruvka's implementation able to handle forests? #2

Open
Laksha-Prashanth opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Laksha-Prashanth
Copy link

Can you please mention what happens in case a vertex does not have any edges connecting to it. Will this implementation give a minimum spanning forest?

Or is that not a valid case?

@SethosII
Copy link
Owner

The implementation of boruvkas algorithm should be able to handle forests by design. Here is a quick test:

Example graph (maze.csv):

6 5
0 3 1
1 2 2
1 4 5
2 5 4
4 5 3

Looks like this:

+ +-+
| | |
+ +-+

Run it with this graph (mpirun -np 2 ./mst -c 3 -r 2 -a 3 -f mazeGraph.csv -m -v):

Starting
Graph:
0	3	1	
1	2	2	
1	4	5	
2	5	4	
4	5	3	
Time elapsed: 0.000794 s
MST:
0	3	1	
1	2	2	
4	5	3	
2	5	4	
0	0	0	
MST weight: 10
Maze:
+ +-+
|   |
+ +-+
Finished

Allthouh the MST weight given is the sum over the forest and the last edge in the output of the MST (0 0 0) doesn't belong to it. This is because the MST graph struct is created at the begining and there I assume that the MST will have as many edges as there are vertices - 1 (see https://github.com/SethosII/minimum-spanning-tree/blob/master/src/main.c#L207).

Does this answer your question?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants