Logo discussion

[VelocityDesign]

I think the @micahlt + @Ekmand logos shouldn't be in the corner, just @Ekmand's or none.
This would only be fair because @Ekmand imagined & Designed it, and all of us are helping. However, on the team page, it should say 'Founded by Ekmand and Archon ...'
@Scratch-Client-4/design

[micahlt]

@Convexpolygon You're right- but the current SC4 logo wasn't intended to be final. It's boring and not unique. I just haven't come up with a good logo yet.

[VelocityDesign]

Ok. That's what thought, any ideas for the new logo
@Scratch-Client-4/everyone

[githubfan]

we need an icon idea

and we kinda also need another way of communication, GitHub/gitter kinda sucks

[rudrathegreat]

i'm into microsoft teams! btw are we pulling all branches to master and then deploying the master branch, because currently we hav a different branch deployed, for consistency, let use one branch where we pull other branches to and then deploy that branch, instead of switching between multiple branches

[d-siganos]

I could design a logo for you. @micahlt @rudrathegreat @locness3

[micahlt]

@BonfireScratch Feel free to make a draft! I'm working on one as well.

[rudrathegreat]

I think I'll be fine if I stick with my own logo on Scratch! thanks for the offer though @BonfireScratch

[d-siganos]

I mean for the website @rudrathegreat

[rudrathegreat]

oh, then that's fine, i often get things mixed up! XP

[githubfan]

lol. anyone on discord rn?

…

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:51 AM Rudra ***@***.***> wrote: oh, then that's fine, i often get things mixed up! XP — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#12 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALIQJCEN7J7TPTAMFD544LLRT6HTHANCNFSM4NI5OKWA> .

[d-siganos]

For the logo, should it be based on the scratch logo? Or should it be more abstract?

[micahlt]

@rudrathegreat That was intentional - just in case, the permissions are now configured where @HexSphere and I have to review and merge pulls.

@BonfireScratch Probably more abstract.

[d-siganos]

@micahlt hmm... Would you like more linear and geometric shapes (triangles, squares e.t.c) or more circles and curves in the logo?

[micahlt]

@micahlt That's your decision! I'm also working on a concept.

[micahlt]

@Scratch-Client-4/design Let me know what you think of this branding concept:

[d-siganos]

Looks good to me

[githubfan]

I like it!

[rudrathegreat]

like it!

[micahlt]

@Ekmand What do you think? This was originally your project xD

[VelocityDesign]

I like that design :)

[bryn-trys]

It's nice, but I think it's a little bold. Maybe instead of red, we use blue?

[rudrathegreat]

Can anyone please check the pull request I opened. I need feedback ASAP

[MiniCoder11]

I really like the concept but I also agree with Mai-Trys. I’m not a lead-designer in this project but I still think that the red-on-black lettering doesn’t quite match the UI style that is used throughout the rest of the interface. Maybe changing the lettering to a lighter blue would match?

[rudrathegreat]

yeah I agree with @MiniCoder11. The design is nice but the colors don't match, maybe the blue colour with a slightly less darker grey background should do the trick!

[micahlt]

@MiniCoder11 @rudrathegreat All right, I'll work on that.

[retronbv]

@micahlt I like it

[VelocityDesign]

yeah I agree with @MiniCoder11. The design is nice but the colors don't match, maybe the blue colour with a slightly less darker grey background should do the trick!

I agree. It will look nice and bring part of the Scratch-y feel into the logo.

[moeenio]

I've marked the discussion about Microsoft Teams/etc. here as off-topic and collapsed it.