You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many components have nice descriptions for parameters and include the corresponding unit information in their comments, e.g. the Resistor or the ConstantPermeance. However, even though this appears to be supported by the @mtkmodel macro, the unit of these parameters is not defined. It would be nice if this additional metadata was made available within the component definitions for introspection.
I'm not sure if the same would be possible for states, but if it is then I imagine that'd be useful as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ven-k
linked a pull request
Nov 8, 2023
that will
close
this issue
Many components have nice descriptions for parameters and include the corresponding unit information in their comments, e.g. the
Resistor
or theConstantPermeance
. However, even though this appears to be supported by the@mtkmodel
macro, theunit
of these parameters is not defined. It would be nice if this additional metadata was made available within the component definitions for introspection.I'm not sure if the same would be possible for states, but if it is then I imagine that'd be useful as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: