TA comment

[Rashedul]

• Excellent readme and great submission.

• Nice structure of the project folder. Pdf report was nice!

• You could try some other scripts besides R.

• You can create a log file to make the debugging process simpler. Find a discussion here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22843775/how-to-create-periodically-send-text-to-a-log-file-while-printing-normal-outpu

• You could use phony targets other than all and clean.

[aleurcelay]

Hi @Rashedul thanks for your feedback! Could you just clarify why the 85 in the achievement section?
*Making a graph of your pipeline, presented in your README and *Adding more structure to the project folder (perhaps folders such as data, src, doc, or others might be appropriate here?), created by automation where appropriate (with commands such as mkdir) were listed as "wow" factors.

Thank you! :)

[Rashedul]

@aleurcelay thanks for you comment.

Yes, you used some shell command in you makefile. It is obvious that you touched some of the "wow" factors and therefore you got 90+ grades in all sections except achievement. To get 90+ in achievement section, you could prepare the hw from the scratch or, could include scripts that were not taught in the class. But I agree with you that you did the hw perfectly and attempted for at least two "wow" factors. So I adjusted your achievement grade.

Best
Rashedul