Categories hierarchy : Fix #411

[nabilatrhea]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive pull-request title
• I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
• I have verified that I am following the COMET-WEB code style guidelines
• I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

Fix #411
Display categorties hierarchy using z-diagram (needs some adjustments to display the diagram on the right of the datagrid)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #418 (ad424cf) into development (dcdc296) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 86.13%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #418      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        78.46%   78.57%   +0.11%     
===============================================
  Files              304      309       +5     
  Lines             6817     6918     +101     
  Branches           697      704       +7     
===============================================
+ Hits              5349     5436      +87     
- Misses            1257     1269      +12     
- Partials           211      213       +2     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...app/Components/ReferenceData/CategoriesTable.razor	83.33% <0.00%> (-7.58%)	⬇️
.../Components/ReferenceData/ParameterTypeTable.razor	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mponents/ReferenceData/CategoryNodeComponent.razor	60.00% <60.00%> (ø)
...ts/ReferenceData/CategoryHierarchyDiagram.razor.cs	73.07% <73.07%> (ø)
...mponents/ReferenceData/CategoriesTableViewModel.cs	65.94% <87.50%> (+0.97%)	⬆️
...ReferenceData/CategoryHierarchyDiagramViewModel.cs	98.00% <98.00%> (ø)
...METwebapp/Components/ReferenceData/CategoryNode.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nents/ReferenceData/CategoryNodeComponent.razor.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[samatstariongroup]

please use semantics from UML (should have been more explicit in the original feature request)

the direction of the arrow is from subclass to superclass and the arrow is an open arrow, see example image below (the "extends"word does not need to be in the arrow)

Some more requests: in case the Category IsAbstarct, set the caption to Italics. In case the category is deprecated, use dotted line as style for box

[nabilatrhea]

@samatrhea Yes, i have added the Open arrow. however it is not displayed (COMETwebapp/wwwroot/images/UML_Open_arrow.svg) i will try to fix that and add the Italic caption for the abstract categories

[samatstariongroup]

I have the impression that in the current solution the arrows are pointing in the wrong direction. The direction should be from subclass to superclass: subclass ---> superclass; please have a look at the diagram i provided as an example

[nabilatrhea]

@samatrhea

[samatstariongroup]

@samatrhea

ok,. so the direction is then indeed correct, its is typical to have the most abstract class on top and the subclasses below. The diagram reads a bit contra intuitiv -> it needs to be flipped

[samatstariongroup]

minor editorial change of formatting

[antoineatstariongroup]

Some small editorial problem and a possible improvement.
Global question: What happen on the diagram if one of the category in the category hierarchy is deprecated?

[nabilatrhea]

Some small editorial problem and a possible improvement. Global question: What happen on the diagram if one of the category in the category hierarchy is deprecated?

Now if a category is deprecated, the diagram is updated also on session refresh

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

86.8% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

The version of Java (11.0.20) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here