You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the proto-collaboration meeting, Neil McCauley pointed out that nu_e CC interactions on oxygen-17/18 have a much lower threshold energy than the analogous oxygen-16 interaction, which leads to much higher cross-sections at low energies.
After a brief search, I’ve found two relevant papers:
Haxton: PRD 36 (1998) 2283 calculates the cross-sections theoretically. Fig. 1 shows the cross-section; the "bump" in the solid line at low energies comes from oxygen-17/18. This implies that those isotopes are negligible (compared to oxygen-16) at energies above ~20 MeV.
Haxton & Robertson, arXiv:nucl-th/9806081 calculates the cross-sections averaged over the solar boron-8 flux and finds that the oxygen-18 event rate is about 6.7% of the total solar neutrino signal (i.e. ~14× smaller than elastic scattering on electrons), while the oxygen-17 interaction is negligible (cross-section and natural abundance are about 3.5 and 5 times smaller than for oxygen-18).
My very rough guess (based on this and the HK Design Report) is that we might see 100–200 events from this oxygen-17/18 channel in HK. This would be a little more than the oxygen-16 channel interaction in the worst case (Totani1998 model, no oscillations), but an order of magnitude fewer events then we’d see for the oxygen-16 channel in the NH/IH scenarios.
Also, the oxygen-17/18 channel would depend only weakly on the mean neutrino energy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A new calculation by Suzuki et al. was posted on the arXiv a few weeks ago. For a Nakazato simulation, they find that the total number of events from oxygen-18 adds about 6–7% to the oxygen-16 number; below 20 MeV, it adds 20–30%.
At the proto-collaboration meeting, Neil McCauley pointed out that nu_e CC interactions on oxygen-17/18 have a much lower threshold energy than the analogous oxygen-16 interaction, which leads to much higher cross-sections at low energies.
After a brief search, I’ve found two relevant papers:
My very rough guess (based on this and the HK Design Report) is that we might see 100–200 events from this oxygen-17/18 channel in HK. This would be a little more than the oxygen-16 channel interaction in the worst case (Totani1998 model, no oscillations), but an order of magnitude fewer events then we’d see for the oxygen-16 channel in the NH/IH scenarios.
Also, the oxygen-17/18 channel would depend only weakly on the mean neutrino energy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: